Older Peer Mentoring among Gifted African American Male High School Students: A Qualitative Case Study
Order Description
You now have seven peer-reviewed references from 2011 or more recent. That is not nearly enough, as your chair pointed out. Try for at least 25. You need to replace outdated references with more recent ones throughout.

Hi Carliss, Attached please find my review of your revised Proposal. You have made considerable improvement, and it should be ready to be approved soon. At present, however, there are still some issues that need to be addressed and some APA issues that need to be resolved. First and foremost, Chapter 2 has to be a minimum of 25 pages in length. It also must include a review of at least 30 current peer-reviewed (journal) sources. "Current" means that the study was conducted within the last 3-5 (perhaps stretching to 7) years. Anything older than that should be a recognized classic in the field or replaced with an updated source. Both your Committee Member and I mentioned this during our last review. The remainder of the issues (some of which were also mentioned in the previous review), such as the format of the References, are much quicker fixes. Please read carefully and resubmit when the issues have been addressed.